You're spending money to learn what works in your campaigns. Pre-market testing shows you before launch. A/B testing shows you after.
The what
Pre-market testing means evaluating your message, creative, or campaign concept before you put it in front of donors. It's the difference between asking "What worked?" and "What will work?"
In 2024, only 26% of nonprofits invested in pre-market testing, even though 80% used A/B testing for email and ads. That means most organizations are learning what resonates only after they've already sent the email, run the ad, or launched the campaign.
The why
A/B testing is valuable, but it's reactive. You're comparing two versions of something that's already live, spending real budget to figure out what you should have known before launch.
And the cost of being wrong? It's not just wasted ad spend. It's missed opportunities during critical giving periods. It's messaging that confuses rather than motivates. It's donors who tune out because your appeal didn't land the way you thought it would.
Pre-market testing flips that script.
You can test positioning statements, email subject lines, visual concepts, or entire campaign themes with real people from your target audience before committing your budget.
Should you care?
Yes, especially for high-stakes campaigns. If you're sending a one-off email to a small segment, A/B testing is probably fine. But for major campaigns, year-end appeals, or anything with significant budget behind it, pre-market testing is worth the investment.
Think about your biggest fundraising moment of the year. Would you rather spend an extra week and a modest budget testing three message approaches to find the winner, or launch with your best guess and hope it works?
The organizations doing this well aren't testing everything. They're strategic about when the upfront investment pays off. But they're not skipping it entirely, either. And that 26% adoption rate suggests most nonprofits are leaving money on the table by launching campaigns blind.
Read next: Storytelling in fundraising: research shows why stories beat stats